Without meaning to, I recently read a trilogy of dictatorial oppression. Victor Kravchenko’s I Choose Freedom, Jung Chang’s Wild Swans and Art Spiegelman’s Maus recount the stories of survivors of brutal regimes that committed murder on an mammoth scale. In spite of the grim subject matter, the books are not in fact exceedingly horrific in their portrayals, preferring objectivity over high-drama and to anyone unfamiliar with the events (not that I am an expert) are well worth reading. They offer brilliant insight into the workings of extreme ideologies, personality cults, and the power they hold over their subjects; effects are still felt today.
I Choose Freedom, is pretty well summed up by its tag line: “the personal and political life of a Soviet official”, covering Kravchenko’s life from a childhood witnessing the Communist revolution to adulthood and defection to the West in 1944. Its publication in 1947 is notable because the Cold War hadn’t really gotten underway. The USSR was still seen in a positive light by many in the West, and when tales of inhumanity did make it out from behind the iron curtain, they were rubbished.
In fact, this is what happened to Victor Kravchenko when the French Communists published an article attacking his picture of complete imprisonment inside a state apparatus that created and fed off fear. Kravchenko later successfully sued them for libel. So too, the widespread famine, slave armies and paranoid witch-hunts did not sit easily with Communist sympathizers who likened Russia to a utopia.
Wild Swans constructs a similarly dystopian image, of a China that blindly loves, and yet is governed in a psychopathic manner by, Chairman Mao. Though Stalin created a personality cult and was admired by Mao, it would appear that the Chinaman took the concept to a new and dizzying heights, installing a regime that indoctrinated the Chinese from a young age. Chang says a few times that although on reflection, the ills of the land could not possibly be caused by anyone but Mao, it took a long time even for her to even contemplate the idea that he my be responsible for suffering on an unimaginable scale.
Its worth noting as well that both books also demonstrate the positives of Communism – examples where good management/ governance was of genuine benefit to the workers/citizens. However, over the lifetimes of her grandmother, her mother and then herself (and in I Choose Freedom), we are shown they system’s corruption and only makes for a more painful reading as the highly capable are persecuted and replaced by the more politically skillful (though inestimably less qualified).
Maus deals with extremism on the other end of the spectrum, telling the story of the author’s father in Poland during the rise of Nazism and the consequent Holocaust. It also differs for a couple of other reasons, a) it is a graphic novel and b) it was awarded a Pulitzer Prize Special Award in 1992. Not having read many graphic novels, I can’t compare it to others but Spiegelman’s use of the medium makes eloquent and beautiful use of both illustration and structure. It is eminently obvious why it is so highly lauded.
Although to say that the story is simply about Spiegelman’s father is rather misleading, I feel that it is as autobiographical, as it is biographical. Spiegelman shows the history and personality of his father, by showing how he researched and wrote Maus. You see how they interact, talk to each other and get an idea of how the Holocaust affected not just the father, but also the son.
Sense from madness
I think try to come away with any grand conclusions would require me to have read more books that I actually have and to be honest, have spent more time thinking about this post than I have. But there are a few things that struck me after having finished all three books.
For a start, the scale of the of deaths that the three dictators are responsible for is immense and he mindset whereby human life is given such a low value is almost unfathomable. In the case of Stalin and Mao, they seemed to be of the opinion that no matter how many people they killed, it was but a drop in the ocean of the overall populations. As for Hitler and the Nazis, they didn’t accept that what they were doing was inhumane, by the sheer fact that the victims were not human.
A feature of the Communist regimes that is worth exploring a little more, is that of the purges. Although both Stalin and Mao had led their countries to victory through revolution and world war, they felt that their struggle was not over and that subversive elements lurked. The numerous witch-hunts claimed many lives and caused untold disruption, what’s more, these purges were frequently conducted to satisfy centrally dictated quotas, which more often than not were used to settle feuds and jealousies. In I Choose Freedom and Wild Swans, time and again ‘the able but politically disinclined’ are picked off, many times by former friends – everyone learnt to look out for themselves.
The legacy of the events also impressed me. Maus is the obvious example of how history still affects the victims but it is interesting to look at how some still deny that these events occurred. Clearly the Holocaust Deniers are an illustration, but we can also see Mao Yushi in China (no relation to Mao), who has faced opposition to his articles calling for a reexamination of Mao’s record 36 years after his death; such is the power of his personality cult.
A modern day example of the personality cults can be seen in North Korea, and while many have either laughed at the North Koreans for mourning Kim Jong-Il, or questioning their sincerity, I think they were genuinely grieving. In an all-seeing, all-hearing, all-controlling state, it is more than possible to make the citizens think that black is white and white is black, even today.


